Wronged, techie gets justice 2 yrs after being jailed Lakshmana Kailash K was jailed after ISP wrongly gave his name to cops looking for man who put up defamatory articles of a historical figure on a social networking site; police detained him for 50 days despite realising mistake By Anand Holla Posted On Thursday, June 25, 2009 at 03:14:45 AM Lakshmana Kailash K has now been awarded a Rs 2 lakh compensation by the State Human Rights Commission Almost two years after he was wrongly jailed for 50 days, Lakshmana Kailash K, a Bangalore-based software engineer, has finally seen justice. Criticising the police investigation and the Internet Service Provider’s (ISP) ‘misleading information’ that led to his imprisonment, the State Human Rights Commission has ordered the company to pay Rs 2 lakh to Lakshmana as damages. Lakshmana was arrested from his Bangalore home – in the wee hours of August 31, 2007 – by the Pune police for uploading insulting pictures and text pertaining to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj on Orkut, a social networking site. The 28-year-old spent the next 50 days in Pune’s Yerawada jail, for no fault of his. The goof up It all began when investigating officer, ACP Netaji Shinde of the Pune Cyber Crime Branch (now retired), sought help from the ISP, Bharti Airtel, Bangalore, seeking information on the vital IP address. The IP address is a number by which a machine can be identified on the network. The ISP, however, due to a mix-up in the time, handed over the wrong address to the police, thus leading to the arrest of Lakshmana. A bench of Justice Kshitij Vyas and Retired IAS officer Subhash Lalla, took suo-motu cognisance of the case from The Times of India story, and Ketan Tanna, who reported the incident, filed an affidavit ascertaining his story to be authentic. Bharti Airtel, in its defence, pleaded that it provided an incorrect IP address, due to an ‘AM-PM’ goof-up. It said that Shinde – in his communication to the cyber crime unit – didn’t indicate the logging time as “1:11:57 am or pm”, but only “01:11:57 GMT”. “A small change in AM or PM, that is, the time component in the IP address, changed the entire complexion of the information,” the company argued. Claiming that they had no role to play in the violation of Lakshmana’s human rights, Bharti Airtel said that the police acted with negligence. However, the commission held that both Shinde and Airtel ‘tried to prove their innocence and blamed each other’. The ruling The bench noted that if Airtel was confused over the AM and PM, it could have sought particulars instead of providing wrong information. “Airtel officials misled the police by providing wrong information. They did not care to check whether the requested time was AM or PM, and gave details of the victim who had used the same IP address at 01:11:57 am, whereas the derogatory remarks were posted at 01:11:57 pm. The AM, PM discrepancies cannot be a ground to absolve the company. It was expected from the company to take a little care to verify whether it has provided the correct information… We hold that Airtel is responsible for providing false information to the police, which led to Lakshmana’s arrest,” the bench stated. Remarking on Shinde’s investigation as being riddled with ‘serious errors’, the commission said that the ACP should have sought further proof before arresting Lakshmana. The bench, however, did not order any action against the now retired Shinde, but left it to the state government to hold an enquiry against him. Shinde has practically little knowledge and experience of cyber crimes, the commission ruled, recommending that the government “review existing policies and allow only those officers with expertise and knowledge about cyber crimes, to investigate such crimes”. The commission concluded that Lakshmana had to endure a lot of pain and suffering due to the acts of both the company and police authorities. In jail, Lakshmana was given a bowl in which he had to eat and drink, and even take to the loo. As a result of the stress, he lost 12 kilos; his kidney stone problem was aggravated; and his liver got enlarged. However, the commission turned down Lakshmana’s compensation claim of Rs 20 crores, ordering a ‘reasonable token amount’ of Rs 2 lakh to be paid as damages by Airtel. When contacted, Shinde said, “I don’t know anything about the order, and what the commission has observed on me.” An Airtel spokesperson, however, refused to comment on the ruling.

Lakshmana Kailash K has now been awarded a Rs 2 lakh compensation by the State Human Rights Commission

free sms channel for cancer related news

those who would like to receive news related to cancer and read them on  the net can subscribe to http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/cancerhelp
this is a sms news channel for cancer related news that i have created. there is no charges and it is free. please go to the address http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/cancerhelp and add yourself/number. every day any news related to cancer shall be smsed to you once or twice a day. please pass it on to those who are interested. regards ketan

‘India should take up Baha’is’ concerns with Iran’

‘India should take up Baha’is’ concerns with Iran’
9 Jun 2008, 0057 hrs ISTThe five and half million-strong Baha’i community across the world is extremely disturbed over the arrest of their top leadership in Iran. Bani Dugal, principal representative of the Baha’i International Community to the United Nations, spoke to Ketan Tanna:

Q: Why is the Baha’i community rattled over the arrest of six Baha’i leaders in Iran?

We have not received any information about where they are being held, nor have they been given access to legal counsel. Their only crime is their practice of the Baha’i faith. These arrests are reminiscent of the previous occasions when the national leadership of the Iranian Baha’i community was arrested in 1980-81 which led to the execution of 17 individuals at that time.

Q: Iranian government says the arrested persons were spies.

Accusations that Baha’is are spies are not new. Such accusations are an effort by the government to stir up suspicion and ill will against the Baha’is within the larger Iranian population. Since the Baha’i faith, through an accident of history, has its headquarters in Israel, the Iranian government often charges Iranian Baha’is with being Zionists and spies.

Baha’is are told they will be released if they agree to recant their faith demonstrating clearly that the real issue is their religious beliefs and practice, the right which is theirs under Article 18 of the International Covenant Civil and Political Rights, to which the govern-ment of Iran is itself a signatory.

Q: What kind of persecution does Baha’i community face in Iran and why?

The 3,00,000-member Iranian Baha’i community is the largest religious minority, and the govern-ment has since 1979 undertaken a systematic persecution against them, solely because of their religious belief. Iranian Baha’is face daily the threat of arbitrary arrest and imprisonment. Their young people are denied the right to higher education and the right to make a living. Baha’i homes and properties have been unlawfully seized. And, above all else, they are not free to practise their religion. And the fact that more than 200 Baha’is were killed or executed by the government between 1979 and 1998 keeps Baha’is under a state of constant threat.

Q: India has good relations with Iran. On the other hand, it also has 1.6 million-strong Baha’i community. What can India do in such a situation?

The very fact that India has good relations with Iran and has the largest number of Baha’is gives her a special responsibility to intercede. Given India’s record of upholding the rule of law, religious freedom and affording constitutional protections for all minority religions she is an example that Iran could emulate. The Indian government could take this matter up bilaterally with Iran.