A sureshot against cervical cancer?

Rema Nagarajan, TNN 2 August 2009, 04:21am IST

SEOUL: Despite a vaccine being available against cervical cancer, the most common cancer among women in India, it might be of little help at the prohibitively high current price of $360 (for three doses) or about Rs 16,000 per At a symposium held here by the International Vaccine Institute, an international research organisation devoted to vaccines supported by various governments, companies and foundations, several health experts and policy makers called for the introduction of routine HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccines into national immunisation programmes, even as they expressed concern about its affordability. “Cervical cancer caused by HPV comprises over 34% of cancers among women in India, making it the most common. Of this, 70% of the cancers are said to be caused by two strains of the virus — HPV 16 and HPV 18 — against which a vaccine has been developed,” explained Dr Neerja Bhatla, additional professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the AIIMS. The vaccine is of no use once a person is already infected with the virus. Hence, being a sexually transmitted virus, for the vaccine to be effective it has to be administered before a girl becomes sexually active. In India, this would have to be between 12-18 years as early marriage among girls is prevalent. This would mean vaccinating a population of over 100 million girls at the cost of Rs 16,000 per child. That would amount to thousands of crores of rupees, several times the size of the entire national immunisation programme. Yet another concern is that being a newer vaccine, it is not known how long the vaccine will remain effective. So far, it has been found to be effective for six to seven years. If a booster shot is required to maintain protection, the cost could be even higher. Moreover, the vaccination is to be given as an intramuscular injection in three doses, each dose costing about $120. If the costs of trained manpower required for such an immunization programme and that of safe disposable needles are taken into account, the cost would be even higher. However, Linda Eckert of the World Health Organisation (WHO) explained that WHO had recommended the use of HPV vaccines in immunization programmes as it was programmatically feasible and since sustainable financing could be secured. She claimed it could be made cost effective as the Global Alliance on Vacines and Immunisation (GAVI) could help subsidise the vaccine for the poorest countries and the Unicef could procure it for poor countries by negotiating for lower prices with the vaccine companies. However, she didn’t elaborate by what percentage such efforts could bring down the price of a vaccine costing over Rs 16,000 per child.

Wronged, techie gets justice 2 yrs after being jailed

http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?page=article&sectid=2&contentid=200906252009062503144578681037483

Lakshmana Kailash K was jailed after ISP wrongly gave his name to cops looking for man who put up defamatory articles of a historical figure on a social networking site; police detained him for 50 days despite realising mistake

Anand Holla

Posted On Thursday, June 25, 2009 at 03:14:45 AM

Lakshmana Kailash K has now been awarded a Rs 2 lakh compensation by the State Human Rights Commission Almost two years after he was wrongly jailed for 50 days, Lakshmana Kailash K, a Bangalore-based software engineer, has finally seen justice. Criticising the police investigation and the Internet Service Provider’s (ISP) ‘misleading information’ that led to his imprisonment, the State Human Rights Commission has ordered the company to pay Rs 2 lakh to Lakshmana as damages. Lakshmana was arrested from his Bangalore home – in the wee hours of August 31, 2007 – by the Pune police for uploading insulting pictures and text pertaining to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj on Orkut, a social networking site. The 28-year-old spent the next 50 days in Pune’s Yerawada jail, for no fault of his. The goof up It all began when investigating officer, ACP Netaji Shinde of the Pune Cyber Crime Branch (now retired), sought help from the ISP, Bharti Airtel, Bangalore, seeking information on the vital IP address. The IP address is a number by which a machine can be identified on the network. The ISP, however, due to a mix-up in the time, handed over the wrong address to the police, thus leading to the arrest of Lakshmana. A bench of Justice Kshitij Vyas and Retired IAS officer Subhash Lalla, took suo-motu cognisance of the case from The Times of India story, and Ketan Tanna, who reported the incident, filed an affidavit ascertaining his story to be authentic. Bharti Airtel, in its defence, pleaded that it provided an incorrect IP address, due to an ‘AM-PM’ goof-up. It said that Shinde – in his communication to the cyber crime unit – didn’t indicate the logging time as “1:11:57 am or pm”, but only “01:11:57 GMT”. “A small change in AM or PM, that is, the time component in the IP address, changed the entire complexion of the information,” the company argued. Claiming that they had no role to play in the violation of Lakshmana’s human rights, Bharti Airtel said that the police acted with negligence. However, the commission held that both Shinde and Airtel ‘tried to prove their innocence and blamed each other’. The ruling The bench noted that if Airtel was confused over the AM and PM, it could have sought particulars instead of providing wrong information. “Airtel officials misled the police by providing wrong information. They did not care to check whether the requested time was AM or PM, and gave details of the victim who had used the same IP address at 01:11:57 am, whereas the derogatory remarks were posted at 01:11:57 pm. The AM, PM discrepancies cannot be a ground to absolve the company. It was expected from the company to take a little care to verify whether it has provided the correct information… We hold that Airtel is responsible for providing false information to the police, which led to Lakshmana’s arrest,” the bench stated. Remarking on Shinde’s investigation as being riddled with ‘serious errors’, the commission said that the ACP should have sought further proof before arresting Lakshmana. The bench, however, did not order any action against the now retired Shinde, but left it to the state government to hold an enquiry against him. Shinde has practically little knowledge and experience of cyber crimes, the commission ruled, recommending that the government “review existing policies and allow only those officers with expertise and knowledge about cyber crimes, to investigate such crimes”. The commission concluded that Lakshmana had to endure a lot of pain and suffering due to the acts of both the company and police authorities. In jail, Lakshmana was given a bowl in which he had to eat and drink, and even take to the loo. As a result of the stress, he lost 12 kilos; his kidney stone problem was aggravated; and his liver got enlarged. However, the commission turned down Lakshmana’s compensation claim of Rs 20 crores, ordering a ‘reasonable token amount’ of Rs 2 lakh to be paid as damages by Airtel. When contacted, Shinde said, “I don’t know anything about the order, and what the commission has observed on me.” An Airtel spokesperson, however, refused to comment on the ruling.

Wronged, techie gets justice 2 yrs after being jailed Lakshmana Kailash K was jailed after ISP wrongly gave his name to cops looking for man who put up defamatory articles of a historical figure on a social networking site; police detained him for 50 days despite realising mistake By Anand Holla Posted On Thursday, June 25, 2009 at 03:14:45 AM Lakshmana Kailash K has now been awarded a Rs 2 lakh compensation by the State Human Rights Commission Almost two years after he was wrongly jailed for 50 days, Lakshmana Kailash K, a Bangalore-based software engineer, has finally seen justice. Criticising the police investigation and the Internet Service Provider’s (ISP) ‘misleading information’ that led to his imprisonment, the State Human Rights Commission has ordered the company to pay Rs 2 lakh to Lakshmana as damages. Lakshmana was arrested from his Bangalore home – in the wee hours of August 31, 2007 – by the Pune police for uploading insulting pictures and text pertaining to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj on Orkut, a social networking site. The 28-year-old spent the next 50 days in Pune’s Yerawada jail, for no fault of his. The goof up It all began when investigating officer, ACP Netaji Shinde of the Pune Cyber Crime Branch (now retired), sought help from the ISP, Bharti Airtel, Bangalore, seeking information on the vital IP address. The IP address is a number by which a machine can be identified on the network. The ISP, however, due to a mix-up in the time, handed over the wrong address to the police, thus leading to the arrest of Lakshmana. A bench of Justice Kshitij Vyas and Retired IAS officer Subhash Lalla, took suo-motu cognisance of the case from The Times of India story, and Ketan Tanna, who reported the incident, filed an affidavit ascertaining his story to be authentic. Bharti Airtel, in its defence, pleaded that it provided an incorrect IP address, due to an ‘AM-PM’ goof-up. It said that Shinde – in his communication to the cyber crime unit – didn’t indicate the logging time as “1:11:57 am or pm”, but only “01:11:57 GMT”. “A small change in AM or PM, that is, the time component in the IP address, changed the entire complexion of the information,” the company argued. Claiming that they had no role to play in the violation of Lakshmana’s human rights, Bharti Airtel said that the police acted with negligence. However, the commission held that both Shinde and Airtel ‘tried to prove their innocence and blamed each other’. The ruling The bench noted that if Airtel was confused over the AM and PM, it could have sought particulars instead of providing wrong information. “Airtel officials misled the police by providing wrong information. They did not care to check whether the requested time was AM or PM, and gave details of the victim who had used the same IP address at 01:11:57 am, whereas the derogatory remarks were posted at 01:11:57 pm. The AM, PM discrepancies cannot be a ground to absolve the company. It was expected from the company to take a little care to verify whether it has provided the correct information… We hold that Airtel is responsible for providing false information to the police, which led to Lakshmana’s arrest,” the bench stated. Remarking on Shinde’s investigation as being riddled with ‘serious errors’, the commission said that the ACP should have sought further proof before arresting Lakshmana. The bench, however, did not order any action against the now retired Shinde, but left it to the state government to hold an enquiry against him. Shinde has practically little knowledge and experience of cyber crimes, the commission ruled, recommending that the government “review existing policies and allow only those officers with expertise and knowledge about cyber crimes, to investigate such crimes”. The commission concluded that Lakshmana had to endure a lot of pain and suffering due to the acts of both the company and police authorities. In jail, Lakshmana was given a bowl in which he had to eat and drink, and even take to the loo. As a result of the stress, he lost 12 kilos; his kidney stone problem was aggravated; and his liver got enlarged. However, the commission turned down Lakshmana’s compensation claim of Rs 20 crores, ordering a ‘reasonable token amount’ of Rs 2 lakh to be paid as damages by Airtel. When contacted, Shinde said, “I don’t know anything about the order, and what the commission has observed on me.” An Airtel spokesperson, however, refused to comment on the ruling.

Lakshmana Kailash K has now been awarded a Rs 2 lakh compensation by the State Human Rights Commission